Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
Page 1 of 1
Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
First - Two headlines from two of the 'deep state' actors I watch...
First, Sibel Edmonds, a FBI translator turned 911 whistle-blower, who does solid 'deep state' analysis
Next, is arch-neocon 'Jimmy' Woolsey, the living embodiment of Sibel's prediction. Woolsey did plenty of work to get the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and was Trump's spokesmen during the 2016 election, so I look to him for the pro-war "talking points"...
and the crowning touch....
The purpose Solemimani assassination appears obvious at this stage: it was an attack to degrade Iran's ability to defend itself and to feel terrorize the Iranian population into submission. This assassination has been followed by yet another round of Iranian demonization - war is the goal - and it always has been the goal. Debates about 'domestic fascism' pale in the face of this monstrous US foreign aggression.
I've seen plenty of weird (aka normally pro-war voices) urging "calm" after the US hit job: "Hey, dude, calm down. Sure, the insane gang always threatening to kill you just assassinated your security guard so they get to you, but don't get riled up! Go back to sleep..."
I have also seen enough "leftist" demanding that we remain "neutral" as the US puts on it's skull-mask to kill another country - because Iran mistreats its workers! As a vigorous protester in my youth I have complete sympathy with those fighting their oppressive governments, but when US Imperialism is bragging about how it will DESTROY another resisting country, I have trouble understanding how supporting pro-Trump rallies within Iran at this moment in time is "leftist".
I don't have to like the Iranian theocracy to 100% support it's struggle against the Anglo-American Empire. I'm sure the Polish government was harsh on it's proletariat or didn't have enough "freedom of speech" when Germany invaded, and I'm sure the Germans made a bunch of claims of how they were the moral ones in their invasion. A thin patina of "human rights" does not change the stinking toxic turd of imperialist violence.
First, Sibel Edmonds, a FBI translator turned 911 whistle-blower, who does solid 'deep state' analysis
Next, is arch-neocon 'Jimmy' Woolsey, the living embodiment of Sibel's prediction. Woolsey did plenty of work to get the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and was Trump's spokesmen during the 2016 election, so I look to him for the pro-war "talking points"...
and the crowning touch....
Trudeau Furioso
The purpose Solemimani assassination appears obvious at this stage: it was an attack to degrade Iran's ability to defend itself and to feel terrorize the Iranian population into submission. This assassination has been followed by yet another round of Iranian demonization - war is the goal - and it always has been the goal. Debates about 'domestic fascism' pale in the face of this monstrous US foreign aggression.
I've seen plenty of weird (aka normally pro-war voices) urging "calm" after the US hit job: "Hey, dude, calm down. Sure, the insane gang always threatening to kill you just assassinated your security guard so they get to you, but don't get riled up! Go back to sleep..."
I have also seen enough "leftist" demanding that we remain "neutral" as the US puts on it's skull-mask to kill another country - because Iran mistreats its workers! As a vigorous protester in my youth I have complete sympathy with those fighting their oppressive governments, but when US Imperialism is bragging about how it will DESTROY another resisting country, I have trouble understanding how supporting pro-Trump rallies within Iran at this moment in time is "leftist".
- Tell me again how the "workers" are doing in Libya?
- How did the crusade for "women's rights" go in Afghanistan?
- Do the surviving Iraqis have more "human rights" as their country is occupied by ISIS?
- Would the average Syrians be better under anarchy and ISIS? Because if Iran & Russia hadn't assisted Syria it would have been toppled ISIS-associated militias & backed by the Gulf monarchies, Turkey and many Western powers.
I don't have to like the Iranian theocracy to 100% support it's struggle against the Anglo-American Empire. I'm sure the Polish government was harsh on it's proletariat or didn't have enough "freedom of speech" when Germany invaded, and I'm sure the Germans made a bunch of claims of how they were the moral ones in their invasion. A thin patina of "human rights" does not change the stinking toxic turd of imperialist violence.
Last edited by Hobb on Mon 20 Jan 2020 - 18:43; edited 5 times in total
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Re: Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
A brief timeline on "Preventive Wars"
“We do not believe in aggressive or preventive war. Such war is the weapon of dictators."
US President Harry Truman (1950)
“The United States and its allies must reject the concept of preventive war.”
US President Dwight Eisenhower (1955)
“All of us have heard this term ‘preventive war’ since the earliest days of Hitler. I wouldn’t even listen to anyone seriously that came in and talked about such a thing.”
US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles (1955)
[...]
"Managing an Asymmetric World – A Case for Preventive War"
The title of serial killer Col. Russell William's Masters essay for the Canadian Royal Military College (2006)
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Re: Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
1) Empire chooses a target for geopolitical reasons
2) Empire begins to militarily degrade & politically isolate target
3) Empire launches political and media campaign to demonize target and create public support
4) A "war-triggering event" occurs (target openly resists, false flag takes place, a 'red line' is crossed)
The media and politics explaining the "morality" of a specific instance of imperial aggression is subsequent to choosing a target and part of the military campaign.
To not realize this and to copy and spread war propaganda is to part of the military campaign.
I have to update this because Trump's assassination of Gen. Soleimani preceded the media and politics explaining the "morality" of a specific instance of imperial aggression.
DailyBeast wrote:In the hours after the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani on Jan. 3, U.S. officials in the White House, Pentagon, and State Department worked overtime on assembling a plan to handle the fallout, only to watch senior administration officials and the president himself scuttle their effort in real time on national television.
The ensuing days became a mad dash to reconcile the intense intra-administration tensions over what the intelligence actually said about Iranian plots, and how best to sell their case to the American public. At the very top was a president who stewed and complained to staff about how the killing he’d just ordered might negatively affect his re-election prospects...
"Yeah, it had been in the works for some time. But it didn’t feel like we were all thinking the same on how to move forward,” said one U.S. official, referring to the strike on Soleimani. “It was like, ‘OK, now what?’”
For more than a week afterwards, Trump, Pompeo, Vice President Mike Pence and officials from the national security community, including at the Pentagon, held twice-daily meetings and conference calls to make sure all government agencies were on the same page regarding messaging, according to two individuals familiar with those conversations. Officials at the State Department, in coordination with the White House, drafted talking points advising those who would appear in the media to underscore Soleimani’s “malign activities" [I thought "malevolent" was the preferred smear de jure...]
Despite that effort, what resulted appeared to be an uncoordinated effort to justify an action by national security officials who were varied in their answers about the pre-strike intelligence and who struggled to define the administration’s strategy on Iran post strike.
Trump was “preoccupied” and adamant that the administration “get things back to normal” with Iran and framing the strike as a de-escalatory measury , even as he publicly celebrated this massive escalation with Iran and aggressively campaigned on, and fundraised off of, his decision. Part of that confusion on messaging came as a result of abundant input by GOP lawmakers with “aggressive opinions on how to handle Iran,” as one official put it. “I didn’t have any specific targets in mind,” said one senior Republican. “I just thought we needed to be doing more.”
After two weeks of shifting talking points on Iran, re-defining the administration’s policy, Pompeo seemed to edge the closest to articulating a clear response on the administration’s policy when he appeared for a speech at [James Woolsey's alma mater] Hoover Institution at Stanford University on Jan. 13: “President Trump and those of us on his national security team want Iran to act like a normal nation. Just be like Norway.”
Last edited by Hobb on Tue 21 Jan 2020 - 17:11; edited 2 times in total
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Re: Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
Both the Canada and the US have been ruled by 'neo-con' regimes since the US launched its 'wars of terror'.
It was obvious with Harper and Bush II, but Trump and Trudeau II are both largely 'neo-cons', the difficulty in identifying this is that Trump is a 'populist neo-con' and Trudeau II is a 'neo-lib neo-con' so their surface personas contrast but actual policies are deeply aligned. You could even get 'neo-con' NDPers, as they have no deep 'anti-war' sentiment on a official level and voted with the Libs and Cons to condemn to pro-Palestinian Quakers.
What dumpster-fire on "the right" doesn't realize is that Canada & the USA's 'good cop/bad cop' routine is more effective than their beloved 'we're all assholes' platform. Democrats & Liberals do 'soft power' like human right tirades and proxy militas, Republicans do 'hard power' like full invasions and high-level assassinations. 'Soft power' is what convinces people in Hong Kong to engage in a suicidal uprising or what convinces the UN to accept US fascist-backed coups in the Ukraine and Bolivia.
The right's endless bout with 'koro' means they want full-bore fascism but their neo-con masters, like James Woolsey, know better. He specialized in the study of European fascism at Stanford before the got his Cecil Rhodes scholarship, Woolsey thinks he knows how to forge a lasting fascism...
It was obvious with Harper and Bush II, but Trump and Trudeau II are both largely 'neo-cons', the difficulty in identifying this is that Trump is a 'populist neo-con' and Trudeau II is a 'neo-lib neo-con' so their surface personas contrast but actual policies are deeply aligned. You could even get 'neo-con' NDPers, as they have no deep 'anti-war' sentiment on a official level and voted with the Libs and Cons to condemn to pro-Palestinian Quakers.
What dumpster-fire on "the right" doesn't realize is that Canada & the USA's 'good cop/bad cop' routine is more effective than their beloved 'we're all assholes' platform. Democrats & Liberals do 'soft power' like human right tirades and proxy militas, Republicans do 'hard power' like full invasions and high-level assassinations. 'Soft power' is what convinces people in Hong Kong to engage in a suicidal uprising or what convinces the UN to accept US fascist-backed coups in the Ukraine and Bolivia.
The right's endless bout with 'koro' means they want full-bore fascism but their neo-con masters, like James Woolsey, know better. He specialized in the study of European fascism at Stanford before the got his Cecil Rhodes scholarship, Woolsey thinks he knows how to forge a lasting fascism...
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Re: Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
Robbie Martin wrote:i feel like not enough people are talking about how Fox New has returned back to the 'Attack of the Neocons' era after the Soleimani assassination [...it's the] 'outfoxed' paradigm right now, these neocon bastards are multiplying at an alarming rate
New York Times wrote:"People close to him estimate that Mr. Trump spends at least four hours a day, and sometimes as much as twice that, in front of a television, sometimes with the volume muted, marinating in the no-holds-barred wars of cable news and eager to fire back"
TheHill wrote:Trump begins each day around 5:30 a.m. by turning on CNN before quickly flipping to Fox News's "Fox & Friends." He occasionally watches MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” because it works him up, Trump’s friends told the Times.
Trump’s favorite programs include "Fox & Friends" as well as Fox News primetime shows from Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Jeanine Pirro. Trump sometimes “hate-watches” CNN host Don Lemon, according to the report.
The Times also reports that the only people allowed to touch the remote control for the White House television are Trump and White House technical support staffers. Trump also had a 60-inch flat screen TV installed in his private White House dining room, according to Time magazine.
Trump often tweets about Fox News and CNN segments just after they air live.
Trump doesn't want an unpopular war but.... "Fox News had its highest-rated year in prime time in the network’s 23-year history, with a total average audience of 2.5 million viewers, according to ratings data compiled by Nielsen, making it the top-rated basic cable network" (Forbes).
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Re: Jan 20, 2020 - The Coming Iranian WMD crisis?
NeoCon: We must never let another aggressive and authoritarian European power like Germany rise again to predate on smaller nations!
{applause}
NeoCon: Therefore we must become an aggressive and authoritarian USA bristling with military hardware...
{applause}
NeoCon: ...and attack a variety smaller, oil-rich, nations!
{applause}
There only good thing about fighting this neo-con nonsense for 20 years is that you stop expecting anything like 'reason' - it's like watching 'Dr Who", once you stop expecting reason, logic or science it becomes less painful....
{applause}
NeoCon: Therefore we must become an aggressive and authoritarian USA bristling with military hardware...
{applause}
NeoCon: ...and attack a variety smaller, oil-rich, nations!
{applause}
There only good thing about fighting this neo-con nonsense for 20 years is that you stop expecting anything like 'reason' - it's like watching 'Dr Who", once you stop expecting reason, logic or science it becomes less painful....
Hobb- Admin
- Posts : 1671
Join date : 2015-03-31
Age : 49
Similar topics
» The Sunmachine is Coming Down
» R2N - Road to 2020
» Early Jan 2020
» Late Jan, 2020
» 2020 - Too late for the Liberals
» R2N - Road to 2020
» Early Jan 2020
» Late Jan, 2020
» 2020 - Too late for the Liberals
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum